Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
EC877 and EC1112
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
12-18-2024, 04:39 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 151
|
Packet Tracer Labs
Forum: Site News & Issues
Last Post: help_desk
12-16-2024, 07:34 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 1,369
|
EC1103 and EC672
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
12-12-2024, 05:24 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 161
|
EC935
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
12-10-2024, 05:22 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 187
|
IP Services Sim
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: forumsupport
11-29-2024, 06:42 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 337
|
PASSED!
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: brownhorse
11-23-2024, 12:55 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 257
|
Passed Exam
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: brownhorse
11-16-2024, 01:25 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 787
|
AN324
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
11-13-2024, 10:19 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 484
|
AN413
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
11-08-2024, 01:11 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 514
|
AND60
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
11-04-2024, 10:37 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 453
|
|
|
ICND2 Exam ----Feedback |
Posted by: coolblullc - 03-03-2013, 07:03 PM - Forum: Exam Experience
- No Replies
|
|
Recently lot of my students have complained that they only got 4 questions out of ICND2 exam material available on this site , the labs are fine (VTP and Frame Relay Sim popular). ICND1 exam did have good feedback . Any Idea if Cisco has changed the exam or this site is not updated .
|
|
|
PASSED ICND PART 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Posted by: qfmoney - 02-28-2013, 06:44 PM - Forum: Exam Experience
- No Replies
|
|
Just passed icnd 2 this morning. Originally i failed icnd 2 by 5 points and my teacher showed me how2pass and the rest is history. After i had failed i waited the 1 week before taking it again and passed thanks to how2pass. My sources are packet tracer;todd ccna book and how2pass.
|
|
|
QID:NA29 |
Posted by: havenlad - 02-28-2013, 12:22 AM - Forum: Answer this question
- Replies (2)
|
|
With this question, about CDP, the exhibit gives us the Bravo router IP is 10.1.1.2
The answer says we can tell from the output the Alpha router IP is 10.1.1.1. How? It could be a few different ones depending how it is subnetted
|
|
|
Passed today |
Posted by: e24com - 02-25-2013, 08:35 PM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- No Replies
|
|
Hello everyone,
I just passed today 642-902 with score 930.
Again, I recommend Cisco Press and CBT nuggets to understand the concepts and foundations, and afterwards H2P.
I had 4 simulations, 53 questions in total. In my case 3 minutes left, so time is running fast.
If you not understand Hands-on labs and you are not able to solve those in less than 10 minutes, simply you are not ready for the exam.
Good luck...
|
|
|
NA486 |
Posted by: havenlad - 02-23-2013, 04:18 PM - Forum: Answer this question
- Replies (2)
|
|
This answer seems to me to be wrong. What do others think?
There are 3 routers connected via serial links. The routers have 27 hosts, 17 hosts and the one we are looking at has 13 hosts. The question is which address should the fast ethernet address have.
We are subnetting on 192.168.1.0 with a mask of 255.255.255.224
That's ok so far, but is says we are using RIP1. How would that work with a subnet of 224. Surely it would not see the subnetted bits if using RIP1?
The answer I find even more strange. Options are:
xx.xx.xx.64
xx.xx.xx.192
xx.xx.xx.190
xx.xx.xx.31
xx.xx.xx.127
I went for 64 as 192 seemed less correct.
The answer was 190, because all the others are either broadcasts or subnets. But if we are looking for a fast ethernet port from a router with a number of hosts, it would be subnet address surely no?
|
|
|
QID:NA449 Troubleshooting LAN interface in full duplex |
Posted by: dandenoth - 02-18-2013, 06:02 PM - Forum: Answer this question
- Replies (1)
|
|
So on this question, it asks what error condition can be immediately ruled out, when troubleshooting a LAN interface operation in full duplex mode. The answer it gives, collisions, is the best answer of those given, however, wouldn't collisions still be a possibility if the LAN segment exceeds the max cable length? Just a couple weeks ago at work, in fact, we had this issue where an end user was connected to their access switch using an Cat5 cable that was probably about 20 - 30 feet over the max length, and they had collision issues.
|
|
|
|