I wanted to discuss this question. I don't think the answer specified is correct. If the peering was going to be via the loopback IPs then two things would be required:

a) A static route to the loopback IPs on the opposing router
b) EBGP multihop to allow peering via loopback.


Neither of these are shown in this configuration. 

My gut feel is the answer should be the peering on the 10.24.24. addresses with the update source command for looopback?

What are peoples thoughts on this?


Thanks

There is a typo in the answer to this question. All of the source static statements have the same IP address.

FF01::101 is NOT a multicast address that represents all NTP servers...

It should be FF05::101 as per https:\\doc.ntp.org/archives/4.2.0/assoc/

Whenever I do the full test, some of the answers always come up wrong and says my answer was N/A, as if I did not answer those. I do completely answer these. When I repeat just those questions, with the same answers, I get it right. Not sure what is wrong with these. I've copied them down.

QID:AND08
QID:AND29
QID:AND29
QID:AND30
QID:AND31
QID:AND32


Thanks,

Joe

I recreated this scenario in packet tracer and didn't work as the answer suggests. Even though this command ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::14/64 fd00:12::2 200 includes the host address, the /64 suggests this is a floating static network route. The question wants a host /128 route.

I think these should be the answers to the question. This solution did work in packet tracer.

ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::/64 fd00:12::2
ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::14/128 fd00:13::3

Thanks,

Joe

Hi

I there are two duplicate answers that are the same in this question. Something appears wrong. I think one was supposed to be a standard access list maybe ?

Please can this question be fixed? The VRF names are wrong in the answers.

In AN354 is a typo.

2001:db8:2::/64 should be 2001:db8:23::/64

Cu

I'm pretty sure the answer to this question is wrong, it should be "The WLC is connected outside of the fabric" 

Even see the link you have provided in the explanation:

"From a network deployment perspective, the access points are connected in the overlay network while the WLC resides outside the SD-Access fabric in the traditional IP network"

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/doc...-wl-dg.pdf

Hi Admin

It seems that the picture for this question is not correct. It shows duplicate info. For e.g. the answer says configure SW2 to trunk but every switch is in access mode in these pics. 

Thanks