Hi guys, i'm passed in the exam 200-301 on last week.

Because the last updated on December 15, i believe than 70-80% from the questions here stay in real exam.
If you dont stay ready, maybe you need wait a new update.

The actual exam have a lot of questions about IPv6, Routing and ACL, if this help you.

I just have to thank this site, THANK YOU HOW2PASS.

Good luck.

Recently tested CCNP ENCOR 350-401 it was rough less than half the questions were on there or even close, very disappointed, in the past How2pass has been the authorative source for lots of valid test questions but not this time ?

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

I'm about to take the "CCNA 200-301" on the upcoming month.
My question is, is the pool still updated ? Because it seems a while ago since the last update.

Yours sincerely,
Michael

Hi,
 
Yesterday i passed the CCNA 200-301 exam.
The practice test are accurate and I can only recommend it.

Thankyou

I wanted to discuss this question. I don't think the answer specified is correct. If the peering was going to be via the loopback IPs then two things would be required:

a) A static route to the loopback IPs on the opposing router
b) EBGP multihop to allow peering via loopback.


Neither of these are shown in this configuration. 

My gut feel is the answer should be the peering on the 10.24.24. addresses with the update source command for looopback?

What are peoples thoughts on this?


Thanks

There is a typo in the answer to this question. All of the source static statements have the same IP address.

FF01::101 is NOT a multicast address that represents all NTP servers...

It should be FF05::101 as per https:\\doc.ntp.org/archives/4.2.0/assoc/

Whenever I do the full test, some of the answers always come up wrong and says my answer was N/A, as if I did not answer those. I do completely answer these. When I repeat just those questions, with the same answers, I get it right. Not sure what is wrong with these. I've copied them down.

QID:AND08
QID:AND29
QID:AND29
QID:AND30
QID:AND31
QID:AND32


Thanks,

Joe

I recreated this scenario in packet tracer and didn't work as the answer suggests. Even though this command ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::14/64 fd00:12::2 200 includes the host address, the /64 suggests this is a floating static network route. The question wants a host /128 route.

I think these should be the answers to the question. This solution did work in packet tracer.

ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::/64 fd00:12::2
ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::14/128 fd00:13::3

Thanks,

Joe

Hi

I there are two duplicate answers that are the same in this question. Something appears wrong. I think one was supposed to be a standard access list maybe ?