03-17-2010, 10:39 PM
Hello,
How is it that a OSPF router can enter into a full adjacency with another router if LSAs are NOT received. I am not saying that you are wrong. I could imagine that perhaps static neighbor statements were entered in and this would produce a full adjacency. Obviously they are using some sort of NBMA mode over perhaps frame relay? Just curious thanks.
15. (QID:N2C110) View the exhibit. Based on the command output, what is one reason why no routes from the OSPF neighbor 192.168.0.5 are installed in the IP routing table?
R3 will only install routes from the neighbor with the lowest priority (Pri). If routes have the same priority, routes from the neighbor with the lowest IP address are used.
Routes from backup designated routers are never installed in the IP routing table.
192.168.0.5 is a redundant link to 192.168.0.4, and load balancing is not enabled.
R3 did not receive any LSAs from 192.168.0.5.
Correct Answer: R3 did not receive any LSAs from 192.168.0.5.
How is it that a OSPF router can enter into a full adjacency with another router if LSAs are NOT received. I am not saying that you are wrong. I could imagine that perhaps static neighbor statements were entered in and this would produce a full adjacency. Obviously they are using some sort of NBMA mode over perhaps frame relay? Just curious thanks.
15. (QID:N2C110) View the exhibit. Based on the command output, what is one reason why no routes from the OSPF neighbor 192.168.0.5 are installed in the IP routing table?
R3 will only install routes from the neighbor with the lowest priority (Pri). If routes have the same priority, routes from the neighbor with the lowest IP address are used.
Routes from backup designated routers are never installed in the IP routing table.
192.168.0.5 is a redundant link to 192.168.0.4, and load balancing is not enabled.
R3 did not receive any LSAs from 192.168.0.5.
Correct Answer: R3 did not receive any LSAs from 192.168.0.5.