03-10-2024, 02:21 AM
Still wrong!
How does RD form a neighbor with 10.10.10.3 (itself)
If there is only one AS why do you have the two sites in separate circles? What is the significance of the circles
The diagram shows RB in AS65101, The answer has us configure RB in AS65201.
The bgp neighbors table is wrong.
I believe the first example is for RB, It shows 10.0.0.0/30, 10.0.0.4/30, 10.0.0.24/30 and 10.0.0.2/32 with a next hop of 0.0.0.0. This means those routes are directly connected.
If the top entry is RB then the problem is that RD is receiving the route 192.168.1.1 but not forwarding it to RF (10.10.10.4)
If the top entry "show ip bgp neighbors 10.10.10.3 advertised-routes" is the output from RB, then RB is sending 192.168.1.1 to RD. No need for RB to configure 10.10.10.3 as a route-reflector client if RB is already forwarding the route.
How does RD form a neighbor with 10.10.10.3 (itself)
If there is only one AS why do you have the two sites in separate circles? What is the significance of the circles
The diagram shows RB in AS65101, The answer has us configure RB in AS65201.
The bgp neighbors table is wrong.
I believe the first example is for RB, It shows 10.0.0.0/30, 10.0.0.4/30, 10.0.0.24/30 and 10.0.0.2/32 with a next hop of 0.0.0.0. This means those routes are directly connected.
If the top entry is RB then the problem is that RD is receiving the route 192.168.1.1 but not forwarding it to RF (10.10.10.4)
If the top entry "show ip bgp neighbors 10.10.10.3 advertised-routes" is the output from RB, then RB is sending 192.168.1.1 to RD. No need for RB to configure 10.10.10.3 as a route-reflector client if RB is already forwarding the route.