EC463
I didn't found Json example, but XML. I think first snippet is "target"
https://developer.cisco.com/docs/cisco-n...figuration
<target/> to specify what to modify (in this case "running" config)
<config/> is modification itself for the target config:
NETCONF edit-config to change device hostname
<rpc xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" message-id="">
<edit-config>
<target>
<running/>
</target>
<config>
<native xmlns="urn:ios">
<hostname>CSR1K-REST1</hostname>
</native>
</config>
</edit-config>
</rpc>
Also in the question EC463 "config:" already exist in "edit-config:", so most probably it should be "target:":
EC448:
There is not overload parameter configured.
I don't think it is PAT, but it is NAT. It is dynamically allocate one IP address from the pool to the internal hosts and keep the same IP to translate all traffic for the same host until allocation expired.
We don't now was it Telnet or something else from the provided output.
It looks like one hosts opened communication using NAT and one of the two available in the pool addresses was allocated for this host.
I would consider better answer is "The first packet..."
I didn't found Json example, but XML. I think first snippet is "target"
https://developer.cisco.com/docs/cisco-n...figuration
<target/> to specify what to modify (in this case "running" config)
<config/> is modification itself for the target config:
NETCONF edit-config to change device hostname
<rpc xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" message-id="">
<edit-config>
<target>
<running/>
</target>
<config>
<native xmlns="urn:ios">
<hostname>CSR1K-REST1</hostname>
</native>
</config>
</edit-config>
</rpc>
Also in the question EC463 "config:" already exist in "edit-config:", so most probably it should be "target:":
EC448:
There is not overload parameter configured.
I don't think it is PAT, but it is NAT. It is dynamically allocate one IP address from the pool to the internal hosts and keep the same IP to translate all traffic for the same host until allocation expired.
We don't now was it Telnet or something else from the provided output.
It looks like one hosts opened communication using NAT and one of the two available in the pool addresses was allocated for this host.
I would consider better answer is "The first packet..."