12-01-2010, 11:52 PM
Is there a problem with this question?
The way I see it the mask 255.255.255.192 would yield 4 subnets; the mask 255.255.255.128 would provide 2 subnets. The explanation says that it would be 1022 and 510 subnets respectively.
The way I see it the mask 255.255.255.192 would yield 4 subnets; the mask 255.255.255.128 would provide 2 subnets. The explanation says that it would be 1022 and 510 subnets respectively.