Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I Think N2C73 Has No Correct Answers
#1
I have a couple of problems with this question. 

Lets look at the answers and the problems with each:
*RTA and neighbor 192.168.45.2 are exchanging LSA's
    192.168.4.2 is in 2-WAY state with RTA meaning that they are not going to
*RTA is the BDR
    The DR and BDR both must establish a Full adjacency with all routers on the segment.  If RTA was the BDR, it should have established a Full adjacency with the DROTHER 192.168.45.2.
*RTA is directly connected to the interface 192.168.45.1
    You can see clearly from the diagram that the routers are directly connected on the 10.0.0.0 network.  It is likely that the 192.168.45.0 addresses are loopback addresses that make establish the RID.  That is unless the RID was set explicitly.  BTW Neighbor ID = RID of other Router.
*Neighbor 192.168.45.1 has changed its OSPF priority number
    This is also wrong because the router has a priority of 1 which is the default.

Please see the links below and let me know if I am wrong.

http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/tech/t....shtml#t21

http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/paws/13683/11.pdf
Reply


Messages In This Thread
I Think N2C73 Has No Correct Answers - by JFrost - 12-24-2008, 10:03 AM
Re: I Think N2C73 Has No Correct Answers - by georgemc - 01-10-2009, 10:24 PM
Re: I Think N2C73 Has No Correct Answers - by rohn_tolentino - 01-24-2009, 09:56 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)