10-06-2010, 03:00 AM
IMHO.....
ACL's on an inside router is fine if you are trying to limit bandwidth usage across your network. Just make sure your not reversing the recommendations of where to put standard ACL's and extended ACL's
STANDARD = as close to DESTINATION as possible
EXTENDED = as close to SOURCE as possible
As for routing traffic between the two routers you could do it any number of ways.
static routes.
default routes
RIPv2
IGRP (not recommended)
EIGRP
OSPF( for two routers not really necessary)
Static routes or default routes would be the most logical seeing as you only have two routers and there would be no need for a routing protocol. When you add more routers onto the schema then switch over to a routing protocol.
ACL's on an inside router is fine if you are trying to limit bandwidth usage across your network. Just make sure your not reversing the recommendations of where to put standard ACL's and extended ACL's
STANDARD = as close to DESTINATION as possible
EXTENDED = as close to SOURCE as possible
As for routing traffic between the two routers you could do it any number of ways.
static routes.
default routes
RIPv2
IGRP (not recommended)
EIGRP
OSPF( for two routers not really necessary)
Static routes or default routes would be the most logical seeing as you only have two routers and there would be no need for a routing protocol. When you add more routers onto the schema then switch over to a routing protocol.