AR595 Incorrect exhibit, Nothing wrong with configs - Printable Version +- How2pass.com Forums (https://www.how2pass.com/forum) +-- Forum: CCNP (https://www.how2pass.com/forum/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum (https://www.how2pass.com/forum/forum-15.html) +--- Thread: AR595 Incorrect exhibit, Nothing wrong with configs (/thread-2286.html) |
AR595 Incorrect exhibit, Nothing wrong with configs - pc_evans - 03-02-2024 The exhibit showing pings has wrong destinations. Should be pinging 10.1.1.x not 10.1.2.x Diagram shows Client on the 10.1.2.0/24 network. but R2 fa 0/1 is configured for 10.1.1.1/24. This question is also a bad example of summarization. R2 sees 10.1.1.0/24 as directly connected and connects to 10.1.2.0/24 using the summary router 10.0.0.0/8. R1 performs the same. I am not sure what the problem is here but it is not caused by auto-summarization. Full network connectivity exists with the current configuration. PC1> trace 10.1.2.10 trace to 10.1.2.10, 8 hops max, press Ctrl+C to stop 1 10.1.1.1 0.260 ms 0.107 ms 0.140 ms 2 192.168.1.1 0.365 ms 0.299 ms 0.376 ms 3 *10.1.2.10 0.427 ms (ICMP type:3, code:3, Destination port unreachable) PC1> R1#show ip route 10.0.0.0 Routing entry for 10.0.0.0/8, 4 known subnets Attached (2 connections) Variably subnetted with 3 masks Redistributing via eigrp 10 D 10.0.0.0/8 is a summary, 00:06:23, Null0 C 10.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/1 L 10.1.1.1/32 is directly connected, Ethernet0/1 D 10.1.2.0/24 [90/307200] via 192.168.1.1, 00:05:29, Ethernet0/0 R1# RE: AR595 Incorrect exhibit, Nothing wrong with configs - help_desk - 03-03-2024 There was a typo in the diagram which has been corrected. Thank you! |