| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
EC877 and EC1112
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
12-18-2024, 04:39 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 142
|
Packet Tracer Labs
Forum: Site News & Issues
Last Post: help_desk
12-16-2024, 07:34 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 1,362
|
EC1103 and EC672
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
12-12-2024, 05:24 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 156
|
EC935
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
12-10-2024, 05:22 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 180
|
IP Services Sim
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: forumsupport
11-29-2024, 06:42 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 331
|
PASSED!
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: brownhorse
11-23-2024, 12:55 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 253
|
Passed Exam
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: brownhorse
11-16-2024, 01:25 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 785
|
AN324
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
11-13-2024, 10:19 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 482
|
AN413
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
11-08-2024, 01:11 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 508
|
AND60
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
11-04-2024, 10:37 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 450
|
|
|
| February 2022 (Any known updates?) |
|
Posted by: bitlc01 - 02-07-2022, 02:09 PM - Forum: General
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I'm about to take the "CCNA 200-301" on the upcoming month.
My question is, is the pool still updated ? Because it seems a while ago since the last update.
Yours sincerely,
Michael
|
|
|
| Passed CCNA |
|
Posted by: son1c - 12-28-2021, 10:19 AM - Forum: Exam Experience
- No Replies
|
|
Hi,
Yesterday i passed the CCNA 200-301 exam.
The practice test are accurate and I can only recommend it.
Thankyou
|
|
|
|
| EC161 - EBG |
|
Posted by: jsmith - 12-23-2021, 09:27 AM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
- No Replies
|
|
I wanted to discuss this question. I don't think the answer specified is correct. If the peering was going to be via the loopback IPs then two things would be required:
a) A static route to the loopback IPs on the opposing router
b) EBGP multihop to allow peering via loopback.
Neither of these are shown in this configuration.
My gut feel is the answer should be the peering on the 10.24.24. addresses with the update source command for looopback?
What are peoples thoughts on this?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
| QID:AX001 - example is incorrect |
|
Posted by: aktiont4 - 12-14-2021, 05:40 PM - Forum: General
- No Replies
|
|
FF01::101 is NOT a multicast address that represents all NTP servers...
It should be FF05::101 as per https:\\doc.ntp.org/archives/4.2.0/assoc/
|
|
|
|
| Test #7 Drag and Drop |
|
Posted by: jdrury73 - 12-13-2021, 05:23 PM - Forum: Answer this question
- Replies (2)
|
|
Whenever I do the full test, some of the answers always come up wrong and says my answer was N/A, as if I did not answer those. I do completely answer these. When I repeat just those questions, with the same answers, I get it right. Not sure what is wrong with these. I've copied them down.
QID:AND08
QID:AND29
QID:AND29
QID:AND30
QID:AND31
QID:AND32
Thanks,
Joe
|
|
|
|
| QID:AN354 |
|
Posted by: jdrury73 - 12-13-2021, 03:25 AM - Forum: Answer this question
- No Replies
|
|
I recreated this scenario in packet tracer and didn't work as the answer suggests. Even though this command ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::14/64 fd00:12::2 200 includes the host address, the /64 suggests this is a floating static network route. The question wants a host /128 route.
I think these should be the answers to the question. This solution did work in packet tracer.
ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::/64 fd00:12::2
ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::14/128 fd00:13::3
Thanks,
Joe
|
|
|
|
| EC180 |
|
Posted by: jsmith - 12-07-2021, 07:28 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
- Replies (2)
|
|
Hi
I there are two duplicate answers that are the same in this question. Something appears wrong. I think one was supposed to be a standard access list maybe ?
|
|
|
|
|
