Please review, I think the correct answer should be 

Define a delay timer under track 1

For example :
track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
delay down 10 up 10



Changing the threshold(RTT) to 1500 ms won't solve the issue

Please review, the correct option should be 

"Police the pir for BGP, conform-action transmit, and exceed action transmit"

to avoid dropping the BGP packets, which is causing the BGP flapping/re-calculations

Please Check, I think the correct option is to configure interface bandwidth on all routers, I tested in LAB, 
and traffic did flow through CapeTown --> Tokyo --> Dubai router after following

! Configuration for Cape Town
interface E 0/0
bandwidth 5000
interface E 0/1
bandwidth 10000

! Configuration for Dubai
interface E 0/0
bandwidth 50000
interface E 0/1
bandwidth 5000

! Configuration for Tokyo
interface E 0/0
bandwidth 50000
interface E 0/1
bandwidth 10000

Please review this drag and drop for accuracy.

This is wrong. Here’s why:

• Autonomous Access Point
  ✅ Should have:
  
  • Supports different operational modes
    
  • Accessible for management via Telnet, SSH, or a Web GUI
    ❌ Your version incorrectly says “Requires a management IP address” (that applies to Lightweight APs).
    
• Lightweight Access Point
  ✅ Should have:
  
  • Configured and managed by a WLC
    
  • Requires a management IP address
    ❌ Your version incorrectly says “Supports different operational modes” (that applies to Autonomous APs).
    

• Supports different operational modes
  
• Accessible for management via Telnet, SSH, or a Web GUI
  

• Configured and managed by a WLC
  
• Requires a management IP address
  

Please review, 

Answer should be  It has sub-second failure detection for layer 1 and layer 3 problems

I don't see PacketTracer download links for 'Local User, NACL and Security Sim, and IPv4 and IPv6 Deployment Sim

Please review, I think the correct option is 

access-list 1 deny host 192.168.1.1
access-list 1 permit any
route-map CCNP permit 10
match ip address 1
set ip precedence critical
interface g0/0/0
ip address 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map CCNP


As the above will mark all traffic with "Critical IP Precedence" except for the 192.168.1.1

I just want to confirm if the written tasks are complete? 

This is the most vague tasks that I have seen so far so I just want to confirm if this type of writing is what to expect in the actually exam.

Please check, 

I think all the given options are wrong. Due to OSPF's behavior of preferring intra-area routes (O) over inter-area routes (O IA)

R2 will always send traffic to R3 (intra area) no matter the cost of link. 


Thanks

Please review, I think the correct answer is "Set the AD 100 under RIP Process on R2"

R1 advertises 10.1.1.0/24 to R2 via RIP (AD 120)

R2 redistributes into EIGRP --> R4 learns it (AD 170) [D EX]

R4 advertises to R3 via EIGRP (AD 170) [D EX]

R3 redistributes EIGRP into OSPF --> R2 learns it via OSPF (AD 110) [O E2]

R2 prefers OSPF (110) over RIP (120)

R2 installs wrong route - > Next-hop = R3 instead of R1

Routing Loop, but if we change the AD to 100 under RIP on R2, then R2 prefers RIP route hence no loop, issue solved